Solar Facilities Amendments
Utility-Scale Solar Facilities in Johnson County
In 2021, Johnson County Government began exploring the possibility of changing the Rural Comprehensive Plan and Zoning and Subdivision Regulations to allow for Utility-Scale Solar Facilities (USSFs) in the unincorporated area of the county.
Residents or commercial properties can already install solar energy systems for their own energy needs, and these accessory uses are allowed under county regulations. However, USSFs provide power to large areas, and new county regulations look to address these facilities.
The research and input gathering on USSFs was conducted by the county’s Planning Commission in collaboration with the Planning, Housing and Community Development Department and included consultant expertise and feedback from residents, area cities and industry representatives.
Utility-Scale Solar Facilities: The Issue
USSFs pose unique challenges to the unincorporated areas and nearby cities. Those challenges must be balanced with present and future energy needs and can be mitigated with proper controls.
The county was cautious when determining these new regulatory controls. USSFs are very large-scale projects. They can utilize hundreds or thousands of acres, far bigger than other land uses in Johnson County’s unincorporated area. USSFs have long lifespans: 20-40 years, and in some cases longer.
Developers of USSFs often use existing fields or farms for their projects. Larger projects can require collecting multiple parcels, which are sometimes located in different areas. The process to plan for a USSF includes creating setbacks from the project borders; avoiding floodplain, streamways and other sensitive areas; screening with existing trees or new landscaping; allotting space for fences and driveways; providing corridors for the movement of wildlife; and then placing the solar panels.
Because of their very large size, there are two important issues the county considered while moving forward with USSFs:
- How would these projects impact the development and growth of cities?
- What about the preservation of open space and rural character?
Planning staff and the Planning Commission took these questions and more into account and determined that regulations for USSFs can be created with proper development standards.
The Process to Develop Solar Amendments
The Planning Commission, with the assistance of county staff and a consultant, The Berkley Group, worked to identify USSF characteristics (i.e. large scale, wide geographic distribution and long life spans) and the corresponding impacts on, among other things, future city development, rural character and open space and the environment.
The Planning Commission held nine public meetings (seven of them allowed for public comment including city comment) and a public hearing to gather feedback from residents and other stakeholders.
The BOCC received information on solar facilities sitting as the Committee of the Whole in March 2021 and February 2022.
The Planning Commission's Solar Recommendations
Once land use policies were established, the Planning Commission and county staff drafted zoning regulations, factoring in caution and a desire for moderation, with the intent of preventing the unincorporated areas from becoming inundated with USSFs.
During its Dec. 14, 2021 meeting, the Planning Commission voted to recommend changes to the Johnson County Rural Comprehensive Plan and Johnson County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations in order to regulate Utility-Scale Solar Facilities, with the following development standards.
CUP Term: 20 years. That’s a typical planning timeframe in Johnson County’s Rural Comprehensive Plan. Experience shows planners can predict growth 20 years into the future.
Maximum project area: 1,000 acres. There are viable USSF projects that are 1,000 acres or less.
Maximum project extent: four square miles (2,560 acres.) (Waiver available). Planning staff knew it could be difficult for all of a project’s parcels to be contiguous (butting up next to each other) due to the topography of the county and landowner participation. That’s the reason for creating the project extent. It allows flexibility but also maintains control and keeps a project contained.
Maximum coverage area: Up to 70% of a project can be covered by solar panels. This allows for the management of stormwater, better vegetative retention, open space and wildlife corridors.
Protective buffer: USSFs have to be located at least two miles from a city border (Waiver available). They also must be two miles from another USSF located in an unincorporated part of the county. As of now, with current city limits, that makes 10,391 acres available for USSFs.
Setbacks: Structures have to be at least 50 feet from the project boundary (similar to other existing setback restrictions). This setback can be increased if a project area abuts a non-participating parcel on two more sides, or more than 50 percent of the exterior property lines. Substations and battery energy storage facilities need to be 150 feet from the project boundary. Solar facility structures must be at least 250 feet from existing dwellings.
Screening: Solar panels and equipment need to be screened from roads, residential zoning and existing homes using things like existing vegetation, planting new trees, decorative fencing or berms.
Decommissioning requirements: There is also a plan for decommissioning a USSF. This includes removal of all equipment, stabilizing and reseeding the land, and disposal of materials. This would also include requiring the operator or owner to pay for the decommissioning.
Consideration of Solar Facilities Amendments
The Planning Commission voted on Dec. 14, 2021 to recommend the proposed solar facilities amendments sent the amendments on to the BOCC to review.
During a special meeting on the regulation of solar facilities on April 4, 2022, the BOCC voted to return the proposed solar amendments to the Planning Commission with a request to review and reconsider the following directives:
- Clarification regarding off-site street maintenance and repair.
- Clarification that battery energy storage facilities are allowed related to Medium-Scale Solar Facilities.
- The addition of a performance standard related to battery energy storage facilities and the requirement of applicants to supply, and assume the costs, of specialized fire safety equipment or other protections, if necessary for such use.
- Additional suggested clarifications recommended by planning staff.
- A 25 year Conditional Use Permit term instead of the Planning Commission’s recommended 20 years, with a one-time automatic extension for five years if the project remains compliant.
- A Maximum Project Area of 2,000 acres, instead of the Planning Commission’s recommended 1,000 acres, including a waiver option.
- A 1.5 mile minimum distance from a city, instead of the Planning Commission’s recommended 2 miles, including a waiver option.
- A consideration of adding CUP standards if necessary for impact on surrounding landowners due to the addition of transmission lines to service solar facilities.
During a special meeting on May 10, 2022, the Planning Commission considered the eight directives as requested and submitted to the BOCC the following recommendation that the solar facility regulations include:
- Clarifications regarding off-site street maintenance and repair to include a requirement that repairs shall be completed in a timely manner.
- Clarifications that battery energy storage facilities are allowed related to Medium-Scale Solar Facilities.
- A performance standard related to battery energy storage facilities and the requirement of applicants to supply, and assume the costs, of specialized fire safety equipment or other protections, if necessary for such use.
- Additional suggested clarifications recommended by planning staff.
- A 20 year Conditional Use Permit term, instead of 25 years, to include a one-time automatic extension for five years if the project remains compliant.
- A Maximum Project Area of 1,000 acres, instead of 2,000 acres, including a waiver option.
- A 2 mile minimum distance from a city, instead of 1.5 miles, including a waiver option.
- Consideration and review, if necessary, of impact on surrounding landowners due to the addition of transmission lines to service solar facilities.
Approval of Solar Facilities Amendments
The BOCC considered the Planning Commission’s revised recommendation.
During a special meeting on June 6, 2022, the BOCC could vote on either:
- Exhibit A, which included the eight directives it outlined during the special BOCC meeting on April 4, or
- Exhibit B, which included the Planning Commission’s response to these eight directives during its special May 10 meeting.
The BOCC voted to approve the solar facilities amendments as outlined in Exhibit A. In its approval of the amendments, the BOCC approved two resolutions: one to amend the comprehensive plan and one to amend the zoning regulations for the purpose of regulating solar facilities in unincorporated Johnson County.
The BOCCC approved resolutions (Exhibit A) include the following standards:
- 25-year Conditional Use Permit term, with a one-time automatic extension for five years if the project remains compliant.
- A Maximum Project Area of 2,000 acres, including a waiver option.
- A 1.5-mile minimum distance from a city, including a waiver option.
Public Information
Johnson County compiled all documents received by both the Johnson County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners on this page to make it easier for the public to locate.
Johnson County strives to make these documents accessible for people with disabilities. If you experience any difficulty accessing the content included in these documents, please contact accessibility@jocogov.org for assistance.
2022 Information
June
- Board of County Commissioners - June 6, 2022 Special Meeting
- Briefing Sheet Solar June 6, 2022
- Redlined Draft Amendments Reflecting BOCC Remand
- Redlined Draft Amendments Reflecting Planning Commission Recommendations
- BOCC Res. No. 037-22 Comp Plan with Exhibit A - BOCC Remand
- BOCC Res. No. 038-22 Zon Reg with Exhibit A - BOCC Remand
- BOCC Res. No. 037-22 Comp Plan with Exhibit B - PC Recommendation
- BOCC Res. No. 038-22 Zon Reg with Exhibit B - PC Recommendation
- Planning Commission Minutes May 10, 2022
- Updated Table Tracking PC Discussion June 6, 2022
- Table Summarizing Planning Commission Recommendations and Reasons - BOCC Remand
- Berkley Group Memo, Dated June 2, 2022
- Public Comments Received May 11-June 3, 2022
- Public Comments Received June 3 - 6, 2022
May
- Planning Commission - May 10, 2022 Special Meeting
- Zoom Recording
- Minutes
- Agenda
- Zoom Procedures
- Public Comment Received April 23, 2022
- Public Comments Received April 29, 2022
- Public Comments Received May 5-6, 2022
- Public Comment Received May 9, 2022
- Staff Memo
- Draft May 10th Comp Plan and Zoning Reg Amendments
- BOCC Special Meeting Briefing Sheet April 4, 2022
- BOCC Special Meeting Verbatim Transcript April 4, 2022
- BOCC Special Meeting Minutes April 4, 2022
- BOCC COW Staff Memo to BOCC February 24, 2022
- BOCC COW Caption File February 24, 2022
- City of Overland Park Utility Scale Solar Comments September 27, 2021
- City of Olathe Utility Scale Comments September 20, 2021
- City of Edgerton Solar Comments September 28, 2021
- City of Gardner Utility Scale Solar Comments September 28, 2021
- Douglas County Solar Regulations
- Letter from City of Gardner dated May 4, 2022
April
- Planning Commission - April 26, 2022 Meeting
- Board of County Commissioners - Public Hearing on April 4, 2022
- Briefing Sheet Solar 4-4-22
- Amendments recommended by Planning Commission
- BOCC Resolution No. 003-22 SF Comp Plan
- BOCC Resolution No 004-22 Solar Regulations and Standards
- Planning Commission Minutes 11 16 2021 public hearing
- Planning Commission Minutes 12 14 2021 recommendation
- Planning Commission Resolution 21-01
- Table Tracking Planning Commission Discussion
- Key Fire and Life Safety Considerations for Outdoor Solar Photovoltaic Battery Energy Facilities
- NFPA Battery Energy Storage FactSheet
- Evaluation of Materials Used at Solar Facilities - Dr. Parkinson
- Dr. Parkinson Professional Information
- Questions with Answers from the KCC
- Pros and Cons from Written Public Comment
- Similarly-Sized Facilities in Urbanizing Counties
- BOCC Solar Presentation 4-4-22
- Dr. Parkinson Presentation 4-4-22
- Meeting Minutes 4-4-22
- Comments Submitted to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, March 30-April 4, 2022
- Public Comments Received April 4-11, 2022
Inspection of Published Standards Proposed to be Adopted and Incorporated by Reference
Please note that due to licensing and/or copywrite restrictions, the following published standards are not available for viewing on this web page:
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems, 2020 Edition; and
Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 9540A Ed. 4-2019, Standard for Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runway Fire Propagation in Battery Energy Storage Systems.
The above standards are proposed as amendments to, and to become part of, the Utility-Scale and Medium-Scale Solar Facility conditional use permit development and performance standards contained within Article 23 of the Zoning Regulations, and which are also part of a broader discussion including proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and additional articles within the Zoning Regulations for the purpose of regulating Solar Facilities.
How to View:
Copies of the two proposed standards are available for inspection Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., at the Johnson County Department of Planning, Housing and Community Development, Johnson County Administration Building, Suite 2000, 111 S. Cherry Street, Olathe, Kansas 66061.
Persons desiring further information may contact the Johnson County Department of Planning, Housing and Community Development at (913) 712-2200, Monday – Friday, from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.
March
- Planning Commission - n/a
- Board of County Commissioners - TBD
- Comments Submitted to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners
February
- Planning Commission -
- Board of County Commissioners
- Comments Submitted to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners
January
- Planning Commission -
- Board of County Commissioners
- Committee of the Whole - January 20 cancelled
2021 Information
December
- Planning Commission -
- December 14th Meeting Agenda
- December 14th Meeting Minutes
- Staff Memo
- Final Draft Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulation Amendments
- Planning Commission Resolution 21-1
- Memo from Berkley Group
- 2-Mile Buffer Map
- Public Comments received between November 15th and December 6th
- Public Comments sent November 9th and November 14th, received by staff November 18th
- Additional public comments received between December 6th and December 13th
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
November
- Planning Commission -
- November 16th Special Meeting Agenda
- November 16th Special Meeting Minutes
- Staff Memo
- Final Draft Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulation Amendments
- Public Comments received between October 26th and November 8th
- All Public Comments received by November 8th Part 1
- All Public Comments received by November 8th Part 2
- All Next Era Comments received by November 8th
- Public Comments received between November 8th and November 15th part 1
- Public Comments received between November 8th and November 15th part 2
- November 23th Meeting - cancelled
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
October
- Planning Commission -
- October 12th Special Meeting Agenda
- October 12th Special Meeting Minutes
- Public Comments received by Oct 4, 2021
- Staff Memo with attachments
- Comments from Johnson County Wastewater
- Public Comments received after Oct. 4th and before 2PM on Oct. 12th Part 1 of 3
- Public Comments received after Oct. 4th and before 2PM on Oct. 12th Part 2 of 3
- Public Comments received after Oct. 4th and before 2PM on Oct. 12th Part 3 of 3
- October 26th Meeting Agenda
- October 26th Meeting Minutes
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
September
- Planning Commission -
- September 14th Special Meeting Agenda
- September 14th Special Meeting Minutes
- September 16th Staff meeting with local farmers
- September 27th Staff visits utility scale solar facility in Pueblo, Colorado
- September 28th Meeting Agenda
- September 28th Meeting Minutes
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
August
- Planning Commission -
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
July
- Planning Commission - cancelled
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
June
- Planning Commission -
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
May
- Planning Commission - cancelled
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
April
- Planning Commission -
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
March
- Planning Commission - cancelled
- Board of County Commissioners
- Committee of the Whole - March 11
February
- Planning Commission - n/a
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a
January
- Planning Commission-
- Board of County Commissioners - n/a